Challenging the late payment culture

Late payments threaten business growth, especially for SMEs.

Tue 24th, Mar

We all want to see less red tape, not more. And we’d prefer to see business disputes resolved by dialogue rather than litigation.

But all the talk in the world can’t protect small businesses from late payment and other forms of ill-treatment by big companies and public sector organisations.

Late payment is a cultural problem. It causes cash flow problems, imposes unnecessary interest charges on suppliers and it’s hard to see how to stop it.

In 2012, The British Chambers of Commerce commissioned a survey of more than 5,000 businesses. Of those, 94 per cent had been paid late and 24 per cent said that nearly half of all their invoices were settled later than had been agreed.

A third of respondents said their worst late payers were larger businesses with more than 50 employees.

Two-thirds said private sector firms were worse than public sector organisations and only a third said the opposite. The latter finding came as a surprise at the time, given that the government had given a commitment to settle undisputed invoices within 10 days.

Several big companies have recently imposed, or attempted to impose, lengthier payment terms. And this is not the only kind of abuse suppliers face: Tesco’s recent problems exposed the scale of the rebates it demands from suppliers; and Premier Foods has come in for criticism for levying millions of pounds in charges on companies that want to remain on its supplier list.

Although George Osborne didn’t mention it in his speech on Wednesday, the Budget contained a promise to extend the Prompt Payment Code, which is administered by the Institute of Credit Management on behalf of the business department.

Currently, the code has only 1,824 signatories and in February there was far from universal backing from its own supporters for plans to strengthen its terms by insisting on a 60-day maximum payment term with 30-day payment as the norm. A survey found that only 57 per cent of respondents believed the changes to be workable.

There are some glimmers of hope. Diageo recently abandoned plans to extend its payment terms for suppliers to 90 days for fear of being delisted as a signatory to the code.

And the Chancellor also promised last week that all central government departments will have to make quarterly reports about their payment records starting from next month.

Perhaps more information, and public naming and shaming of companies which ill-treat their suppliers, is the best hope for challenging the culture of late payment.

Have you experienced late payments? Contact the policy team at policy@liverpoolchamber.org.uk

Read More
Leave a comment

5 minutes with...

Fri 14th, Sep

Claire Currie, Partner and Private Client Solicitor at Kirwans Solicitors

Demand for transport is changing

Fri 31st, Aug

As ArrivaClick launches in Liverpool, we caught up with Asiya Jelani, Director, ArrivaClick, to find out more about the scheme and the wider social and economic benefits to the Liverpool city region.

Trading for the future: preparing for all eventualities

Fri 31st, Aug

Our Chairman Neil Ashbridge takes a critical look at the latest government announcements impacting on future trade and exports.

5 minutes with...

Thu 30th, Aug

Dave Drury, Mott MacDonald’s Director of Transport Planning for the North of England and Scotland

5 point plan to speed up your computer

Wed 29th, Aug

We all know that computers often slow down over time, but why is this and what can you do about it?

Celebrating Excellence in Business

Fri 24th, Aug

Join us at this year’s Annual Dinner and Awards

5 minutes with...

Wed 15th, Aug

Neil Bradley, Partner Manager at Growth Partners Plc

5 minutes with...

Fri 10th, Aug

Gordon Millar, Artistic Director and CEO of Unity Theatre

“Recruitment difficulties and tougher trading conditions face firms amid sluggish UK growth”

Mon 06th, Aug

BCC Quarterly Economic Survey - Looking behind the headlines